Skip to main content
BrewMarkBREWMARK

Grind setting conversion

1Zpresso Q2 vs KINGrinder K6

Two hand grinders cross-shopped at the same money. The Q2 counts 100 clicks; the K6 counts 240 clicks.

1Zpresso Q2 and KINGrinder K6 specifications compared
Q2K6
Brand1ZpressoKINGrinder
ScaleClicksClicks
Dial range0 clicks – 100 clicks0 clicks – 240 clicks
BurrsConicalConical
Espresso → filter32 clicks50 clicks
Filter → coarse40 clicks80 clicks

The same number means different things

Both grinders use a clicks, which makes it tempting to copy a number straight across. Setting 50 clicks sits at grind index 55.4 on the Q2 but 11.6 on the K6 — far enough apart to change the cup.

Converting a setting

If a recipe quotes a setting for one of these grinders, read across for the equivalent on the other. Rows are spaced evenly by grind size, not by dial number — on a conical burr those are not the same thing.

Q2K6
Q2K6
8 clicks30 clicks
14 clicks45 clicks
20 clicks57 clicks
28 clicks66 clicks
35 clicks73 clicks
41 clicks82 clicks
47 clicks92 clicks
52 clicks103 clicks
57 clicks114 clicks
62 clicks125 clicks
68 clicks136 clicks
74 clicks148 clicks
80 clicks160 clicks
K6Q2
K6Q2
30 clicks8 clicks
45 clicks14 clicks
57 clicks20 clicks
66 clicks28 clicks
73 clicks35 clicks
82 clicks41 clicks
92 clicks47 clicks
103 clicks52 clicks
114 clicks57 clicks
125 clicks62 clicks
136 clicks68 clicks
148 clicks74 clicks
160 clicks80 clicks

Side by side, by brew method

Where each grinder lands for the same brew, worked out from its own dial curve.

1Zpresso Q2 and KINGrinder K6 settings for every brew method
MethodQ2K6
Espresso12 clicks39 clicks
Moka pot19 clicks55 clicks
AeroPress (short steep)28 clicks66 clicks
Pour over — V60 / cone39 clicks78 clicks
Pour over — flat bottom44 clicks86 clicks
Drip / batch brew47 clicks92 clicks
Chemex52 clicks102 clicks
French press60 clicks121 clicks
Cold brew72 clicks143 clicks

The shape of each dial

Where the connectors bunch, that grinder’s dial is compressed and single steps count for more. Comparing the two shapes tells you which gives finer control, and where.

1Zpresso Q2

FINECOARSEGRIND INDEX 0–10001001ZPRESSO Q2 DIALEspressoV60French pressCold brew
Where the lines bunch, the dial is compressed — small moves count for more

KINGrinder K6

FINECOARSEGRIND INDEX 0–1000240KINGRINDER K6 DIALEspressoV60French pressCold brew
Where the lines bunch, the dial is compressed — small moves count for more

Dialing in the Q2

Compact and travel-oriented, with a shorter usable range than the larger 1Zpresso grinders. Excellent for filter on the road; the coarse end runs out before French press territory is really comfortable.

Dialing in the K6

KINGrinder's all-rounder, and the value benchmark hand grinders get measured against. External adjustment, 60 clicks a rotation, at 16 microns a click — a coarser step than the 1Zpresso J and X series manage, and the one place you feel the price: espresso is dialable, but in slightly bigger jumps than a stepless grinder gives you. The 48mm stainless heptagonal burrs are what separate it from the rest of the KINGrinder line. If you only ever pull shots, the K4 is the espresso-specific sibling with titanium-coated burrs; the K6 is the one that covers pour over through espresso without being built for either.

Own a different grinder?

Convert between any two of 78 models

The converter runs the same maths for any pair in the catalog.

Open the grind converter →
Take it with you

Send me both charts

Every setting for the 1Zpresso Q2 and the KINGrinder K6, side by side in your inbox.

One email with both charts. Nothing else unless you ask.

Switching grinders mid-bag?

Log a brew, say how it tasted, and BrewMark tells you which way to move — in whichever grinder’s numbers you are actually using. Free on iOS.

Get the iOS app
1Zpresso Q2 vs KINGrinder K6 — Every Setting, Side by Side