Skip to main content
BrewMarkBREWMARK

Grind setting conversion

KINGrinder K6 vs Timemore Chestnut X

Two hand grinders cross-shopped at the same money. The Chestnut X counts 24 clicks; the K6 counts 240 clicks.

KINGrinder K6 and Timemore Chestnut X specifications compared
K6Chestnut X
BrandKINGrinderTimemore
ScaleClicksClicks
Dial range0 clicks – 240 clicks0 clicks – 24 clicks
BurrsConicalConical
Espresso → filter50 clicks7.5 clicks
Filter → coarse80 clicks11.5 clicks

The same number means different things

Both grinders use a clicks, which makes it tempting to copy a number straight across. Setting 12 clicks sits at grind index 0 on the K6 but 36 on the Chestnut X — far enough apart to change the cup.

Converting a setting

If a recipe quotes a setting for one of these grinders, read across for the equivalent on the other. Rows are spaced evenly by grind size, not by dial number — on a conical burr those are not the same thing.

K6Chestnut X
K6Chestnut X
30 clicks5 clicks
45 clicks8 clicks
57 clicks10 clicks
66 clicks11 clicks
73 clicks12 clicks
82 clicks13 clicks
92 clicks15 clicks
103 clicks16 clicks
114 clicks18 clicks
125 clicks20 clicks
136 clicks21 clicks
148 clicks23 clicks
160 clicks24 clicks
Chestnut XK6
Chestnut XK6
5 clicks30 clicks
8 clicks45 clicks
10 clicks57 clicks
11 clicks66 clicks
12 clicks73 clicks
13 clicks82 clicks
15 clicks92 clicks
16 clicks103 clicks
18 clicks114 clicks
20 clicks125 clicks
21 clicks136 clicks
23 clicks148 clicks
24 clicks160 clicks

Side by side, by brew method

Where each grinder lands for the same brew, worked out from its own dial curve.

KINGrinder K6 and Timemore Chestnut X settings for every brew method
MethodK6Chestnut X
Espresso39 clicks7 clicks
Moka pot55 clicks10 clicks
AeroPress (short steep)66 clicks11 clicks
Pour over — V60 / cone78 clicks12 clicks
Pour over — flat bottom86 clicks13 clicks
Drip / batch brew92 clicks15 clicks
Chemex102 clicks16 clicks
French press121 clicks19 clicks
Cold brew143 clicks22 clicks

The shape of each dial

Where the connectors bunch, that grinder’s dial is compressed and single steps count for more. Comparing the two shapes tells you which gives finer control, and where.

KINGrinder K6

FINECOARSEGRIND INDEX 0–1000240KINGRINDER K6 DIALEspressoV60French pressCold brew
Where the lines bunch, the dial is compressed — small moves count for more

Timemore Chestnut X

FINECOARSEGRIND INDEX 0–100024TIMEMORE CHESTNUT X DIALEspressoV60French pressCold brew
Where the lines bunch, the dial is compressed — small moves count for more

Dialing in the K6

KINGrinder's all-rounder, and the value benchmark hand grinders get measured against. External adjustment, 60 clicks a rotation, at 16 microns a click — a coarser step than the 1Zpresso J and X series manage, and the one place you feel the price: espresso is dialable, but in slightly bigger jumps than a stepless grinder gives you. The 48mm stainless heptagonal burrs are what separate it from the rest of the KINGrinder line. If you only ever pull shots, the K4 is the espresso-specific sibling with titanium-coated burrs; the K6 is the one that covers pour over through espresso without being built for either.

Dialing in the Chestnut X

A step up from the C-series in both burr size and build, with a wider genuinely usable range. It reaches espresso more convincingly than any of the cheaper Timemores while staying comfortable for filter.

Own a different grinder?

Convert between any two of 78 models

The converter runs the same maths for any pair in the catalog.

Open the grind converter →
Take it with you

Send me both charts

Every setting for the KINGrinder K6 and the Timemore Chestnut X, side by side in your inbox.

One email with both charts. Nothing else unless you ask.

Switching grinders mid-bag?

Log a brew, say how it tasted, and BrewMark tells you which way to move — in whichever grinder’s numbers you are actually using. Free on iOS.

Get the iOS app
KINGrinder K6 vs Timemore Chestnut X — Settings Side by Side