Skip to main content
BrewMarkBREWMARK

Grind setting conversion

KINGrinder K6 vs Timemore C2

Two hand grinders cross-shopped at the same money. The C2 counts 36 clicks; the K6 counts 240 clicks.

KINGrinder K6

KINGrinder

K6

About $99

Timemore C2

Timemore

C2

No longer sold new

KINGrinder K6 and Timemore C2 specifications compared
K6C2
BrandKINGrinderTimemore
ScaleClicksClicks
Dial range0 clicks – 240 clicks0 clicks – 36 clicks
BurrsConicalConical
Espresso → filter71.6 clicks8 clicks
Filter → coarse57.5 clicks11 clicks

The same number means different things

Both grinders use a clicks, which makes it tempting to copy a number straight across. Setting 18 clicks sits at grind index 0 on the K6 but 50.3 on the C2 — far enough apart to change the cup.

Converting a setting

If a recipe quotes a setting for one of these grinders, read across for the equivalent on the other. Rows are spaced evenly by grind size, not by dial number — on a conical burr those are not the same thing.

K6 → C2
K6C2
31 clicks8 clicks
52 clicks10 clicks
71 clicks12 clicks
83 clicks14 clicks
94 clicks15 clicks
105 clicks16 clicks
119 clicks18 clicks
133 clicks20 clicks
144 clicks21 clicks
152 clicks23 clicks
156 clicks24 clicks
158 clicks26 clicks
160 clicks27 clicks
C2 → K6
C2K6
8 clicks31 clicks
10 clicks52 clicks
12 clicks71 clicks
14 clicks83 clicks
15 clicks94 clicks
16 clicks105 clicks
18 clicks119 clicks
20 clicks133 clicks
21 clicks144 clicks
23 clicks152 clicks
24 clicks156 clicks
26 clicks158 clicks
27 clicks160 clicks

Side by side, by brew method

Where each grinder lands for the same brew, worked out from its own dial curve.

KINGrinder K6 and Timemore C2 settings for every brew method
MethodK6C2
Espresso44 clicks9 clicks
Moka pot68 clicks12 clicks
AeroPress (short steep)83 clicks14 clicks
Pour over — V60 / cone100 clicks16 clicks
Siphon106 clicks16 clicks
Pour over — flat bottom110 clicks17 clicks
Steep and release — Clever / Switch115 clicks18 clicks
Drip / batch brew119 clicks18 clicks
Cupping122 clicks18 clicks
Chemex132 clicks20 clicks
French press150 clicks22 clicks
Cold brew157 clicks25 clicks

The shape of each dial

Where the connectors bunch, that grinder’s dial is compressed and single steps count for more. Comparing the two shapes tells you which gives finer control, and where.

KINGrinder K6

FINECOARSEGRIND INDEX 0–1000240KINGRINDER K6 DIALEspressoV60French pressCold brew
Where the lines bunch, the dial is compressed — small moves count for more

Timemore C2

FINECOARSEGRIND INDEX 0–100036TIMEMORE C2 DIALEspressoV60French pressCold brew
Where the lines bunch, the dial is compressed — small moves count for more

Dialing in the K6

KINGrinder's all-rounder, and the value benchmark hand grinders get measured against. External adjustment, 60 clicks a rotation, at 16 microns a click — a coarser step than the 1Zpresso J and X series manage, and the one place you feel the price: espresso is dialable, but in slightly bigger jumps than a stepless grinder gives you. The 48mm stainless heptagonal burrs are what separate it from the rest of the KINGrinder line. If you only ever pull shots, the K4 is the espresso-specific sibling with titanium-coated burrs; the K6 is the one that covers pour over through espresso without being built for either.

Dialing in the C2

The C2 is the predecessor to the C3 and remains the cheapest genuinely usable hand grinder. Its range covers filter and immersion adequately; expect more variation shot-to-shot than the C3, particularly at the fine end.

KINGrinder K6 vs Timemore C2 — Every Setting, Side by Side