Skip to main content
BrewMarkBREWMARK

Grind setting conversion

KINGrinder K6 vs Timemore C2 Max

Two hand grinders cross-shopped at the same money. The C2 Max counts 36 clicks; the K6 counts 240 clicks.

KINGrinder K6

KINGrinder

K6

About $99

Timemore C2 Max

Timemore

C2 Max

No longer sold new

KINGrinder K6 and Timemore C2 Max specifications compared
K6C2 Max
BrandKINGrinderTimemore
ScaleClicksClicks
Dial range0 clicks – 240 clicks0 clicks – 36 clicks
BurrsConicalConical
Espresso → filter71.6 clicks12 clicks
Filter → coarse57.5 clicks12 clicks

The same number means different things

Both grinders use a clicks, which makes it tempting to copy a number straight across. Setting 18 clicks sits at grind index 0 on the K6 but 33 on the C2 Max — far enough apart to change the cup.

Converting a setting

If a recipe quotes a setting for one of these grinders, read across for the equivalent on the other. Rows are spaced evenly by grind size, not by dial number — on a conical burr those are not the same thing.

K6 → C2 Max
K6C2 Max
31 clicks8 clicks
52 clicks10 clicks
71 clicks13 clicks
83 clicks15 clicks
94 clicks18 clicks
105 clicks20 clicks
119 clicks22 clicks
133 clicks23 clicks
144 clicks24 clicks
152 clicks26 clicks
156 clicks28 clicks
158 clicks30 clicks
160 clicks32 clicks
C2 Max → K6
C2 MaxK6
8 clicks31 clicks
10 clicks52 clicks
13 clicks71 clicks
15 clicks83 clicks
18 clicks94 clicks
20 clicks105 clicks
22 clicks119 clicks
23 clicks133 clicks
24 clicks144 clicks
26 clicks152 clicks
28 clicks156 clicks
30 clicks158 clicks
32 clicks160 clicks

Side by side, by brew method

Where each grinder lands for the same brew, worked out from its own dial curve.

KINGrinder K6 and Timemore C2 Max settings for every brew method
MethodK6C2 Max
Espresso44 clicks9 clicks
Moka pot68 clicks12 clicks
AeroPress (short steep)83 clicks15 clicks
Pour over — V60 / cone100 clicks20 clicks
Siphon106 clicks21 clicks
Pour over — flat bottom110 clicks21 clicks
Steep and release — Clever / Switch115 clicks22 clicks
Drip / batch brew119 clicks22 clicks
Cupping122 clicks22 clicks
Chemex132 clicks23 clicks
French press150 clicks25 clicks
Cold brew157 clicks29 clicks

The shape of each dial

Where the connectors bunch, that grinder’s dial is compressed and single steps count for more. Comparing the two shapes tells you which gives finer control, and where.

KINGrinder K6

FINECOARSEGRIND INDEX 0–1000240KINGRINDER K6 DIALEspressoV60French pressCold brew
Where the lines bunch, the dial is compressed — small moves count for more

Timemore C2 Max

FINECOARSEGRIND INDEX 0–100036TIMEMORE C2 MAX DIALEspressoV60French pressCold brew
Where the lines bunch, the dial is compressed — small moves count for more

Dialing in the K6

KINGrinder's all-rounder, and the value benchmark hand grinders get measured against. External adjustment, 60 clicks a rotation, at 16 microns a click — a coarser step than the 1Zpresso J and X series manage, and the one place you feel the price: espresso is dialable, but in slightly bigger jumps than a stepless grinder gives you. The 48mm stainless heptagonal burrs are what separate it from the rest of the KINGrinder line. If you only ever pull shots, the K4 is the espresso-specific sibling with titanium-coated burrs; the K6 is the one that covers pour over through espresso without being built for either.

Dialing in the C2 Max

A larger-capacity C2, useful if you regularly brew for more than one person and tired of grinding in batches. Grind character matches the C2 — perfectly good for filter and immersion, tedious for espresso.

KINGrinder K6 vs Timemore C2 Max — Settings Side by Side