Skip to main content
BrewMarkBREWMARK

Grind setting conversion

1Zpresso JX-Pro vs KINGrinder K4

Two hand grinders cross-shopped at the same money. The JX-Pro counts 200 clicks; the K4 counts 240 clicks.

1Zpresso JX-Pro and KINGrinder K4 specifications compared
JX-ProK4
Brand1ZpressoKINGrinder
ScaleClicksClicks
Dial range0 clicks – 200 clicks0 clicks – 240 clicks
BurrsConicalConical
Espresso → filter81 clicks70 clicks
Filter → coarse79 clicks80 clicks

The same number means different things

Both grinders use a clicks, which makes it tempting to copy a number straight across. Setting 100 clicks sits at grind index 10.8 on the JX-Pro but 51.8 on the K4 — far enough apart to change the cup.

Converting a setting

If a recipe quotes a setting for one of these grinders, read across for the equivalent on the other. Rows are spaced evenly by grind size, not by dial number — on a conical burr those are not the same thing.

JX-ProK4
JX-ProK4
40 clicks15 clicks
88 clicks35 clicks
114 clicks53 clicks
118 clicks66 clicks
119 clicks77 clicks
122 clicks87 clicks
134 clicks98 clicks
153 clicks108 clicks
171 clicks119 clicks
182 clicks130 clicks
189 clicks141 clicks
194 clicks153 clicks
200 clicks165 clicks
K4JX-Pro
K4JX-Pro
15 clicks40 clicks
35 clicks88 clicks
53 clicks114 clicks
66 clicks118 clicks
77 clicks119 clicks
87 clicks122 clicks
98 clicks134 clicks
108 clicks153 clicks
119 clicks171 clicks
130 clicks182 clicks
141 clicks189 clicks
153 clicks194 clicks
165 clicks200 clicks

Side by side, by brew method

Where each grinder lands for the same brew, worked out from its own dial curve.

1Zpresso JX-Pro and KINGrinder K4 settings for every brew method
MethodJX-ProK4
Espresso68 clicks27 clicks
Moka pot112 clicks50 clicks
AeroPress (short steep)118 clicks66 clicks
Pour over — V60 / cone120 clicks82 clicks
Pour over — flat bottom126 clicks92 clicks
Drip / batch brew134 clicks98 clicks
Chemex152 clicks108 clicks
French press179 clicks126 clicks
Cold brew192 clicks148 clicks

The shape of each dial

Where the connectors bunch, that grinder’s dial is compressed and single steps count for more. Comparing the two shapes tells you which gives finer control, and where.

1Zpresso JX-Pro

FINECOARSEGRIND INDEX 0–10002001ZPRESSO JX-PRO DIALEspressoV60French pressCold brew
Where the lines bunch, the dial is compressed — small moves count for more

KINGrinder K4

FINECOARSEGRIND INDEX 0–1000240KINGRINDER K4 DIALEspressoV60French pressCold brew
Where the lines bunch, the dial is compressed — small moves count for more

Dialing in the JX-Pro

External adjustment makes this the easiest hand grinder to actually dial, because you can count clicks without disassembling anything. Its filter range is generous, which is a mixed blessing — small click changes do less than you expect at the coarse end and more than you expect near espresso. Move in larger jumps for French press, single clicks for anything under filter.

Dialing in the K4

External adjustment at a notably low price, which is the whole proposition. Its click resolution is finer than most grinders in its bracket, so small movements do less than you might expect — move in larger increments than you would on a C3.

Own a different grinder?

Convert between any two of 78 models

The converter runs the same maths for any pair in the catalog.

Open the grind converter →
Take it with you

Send me both charts

Every setting for the 1Zpresso JX-Pro and the KINGrinder K4, side by side in your inbox.

One email with both charts. Nothing else unless you ask.

Switching grinders mid-bag?

Log a brew, say how it tasted, and BrewMark tells you which way to move — in whichever grinder’s numbers you are actually using. Free on iOS.

Get the iOS app
1Zpresso JX-Pro vs KINGrinder K4 — Settings Side by Side